Dear Colleagues,
It is our pleasure to invite you to participate in The 3rd Immuno-Oncology World Congress (Immuno-Oncology2022) which will take place 2-3 November 2022 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Immuno-Oncology2022 will focus on the latest developments and findings in immuno-oncology therapy as well as targeted therapy. The Congress will examine treatments available on the market as well as treatments still in the development stage. The Congress will welcome Oncologists, Dermatologists, Immunologists, Surgical Oncologists, clinical scientists, industry leaders and other experts.
Prof. Jacob Schachter
|
Prof. Dr. Dirk Schadendorf
|
Congress Agenda
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
University Hospital Herlev & University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
University Hospital Essen, Germany
University Hospital Essen, Germany
Prof. Viktor Grünwald
Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has steadily evolved during the past decade. Today, 14 agents have received an EU-label for treatment of mRCC and are used in different lines of therapy. In 2019, ipilimumab + nivolumab (IO-IO) and axitinib + avelumab or pembrolizumab (TKI-IO) were approved for first line treatment and opened a new chapter in treatment perspectives in mRCC. Today’s first line treatment in mRCC offers a landscape with different outcome measures to achieve. While both strategies improved OS in patients, such benefit comes in different flavors. TKI-IO had profound impact on efficacy parameters, but complete response (CR) rates remain modest as of today. Furthermore, TKI-IO treatment comes at the expense of chronic TKI-toxicity, which impacts HR-QoL in patients. On the contrary, IO-IO had only modest impact on response rate, but achieved the highest CR rates reported so far. While IO-IO treatment is associated with its own AE spectrum, it achieves better HR-QoL compared to TKI treatment alone. Furthermore, the pivotal study has the longest follow-up and mirrors results seen in malignant melanoma, indicating a plateau. While the treatment landscape became more divers, early and late benefits can be identified with different treatment strategies, which are integral to our clinical decision making process. So, what is it going to be – CR or tumor control?
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital in Bergamo, Italy
Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL), Netherlands
LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, including a wide range of pathological and clinical behaviors. Current treatment protocols, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone replacement therapy, can cure most of patients, but, particularly in some subgroups like the triple negative or metastatic ones, effectiveness is not enough to impact on survival and more efforts are needed to develop alternative options.
Immunotherapy, as a novel strategy addressing the immune system, has demonstrated a strong potential in treating those highly mutated and immunogenic cancers.
Although breast cancer has long been considered a problematic target for immunotherapy, as it is immunologically “cold,” numerous recent preclinical and clinical reports now recommend that immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, can be used to treat specific subsets of breast cancer patients.
Various strategies include not only immune-checkpoint inhibition with antiPD1s/PDL1s, but also vaccination and adoptive T-cell therapy (CAR-T).
Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 human mAb, was tested in advanced triple negative patients. Expression of PD1 was detected in 60% of patients and efficacy in 27 cases: the overall response was 18.5%, with 1 complete remission reached. Atezolizumab, a human anti-PDL1, was tested with paclitaxel in 32 patients showing anti-tumor efficacy in 70% of TNBC patients. Avelumab, has been evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial showing responses in 40 out of 168 patients (23.8%).
Several vaccine approaches, comprising of monovalent, polyvalent, and cellular vaccines, have been assessed, but results are not satisfactory due to the difficulties in identifying a set of tumor associated antigens able to personalize the treatment.
Adoptive T-cell transfer therapy is still on the run, mainly targeting HER2 positive tumors and new approaches using CAR-T seem effective and safe, meriting further development in clinical trials.
Phyllis Fung-Yi Cheung1, Anna Bazarna1, Elaine HL Siu2, Jia Jin Yang1, Sven-Thorsten Liffers1, Konstantinos Savvatakis1, Kristina Althoff1, Daniel R Engel3, Camille Soun3, Jana K Striefler4, Marianne Sinn4, Marcus Bahra5, Helmut Oettle6, Peter Markus7, Smiths S Lueong1, Jörg D Hoheisel8, Siu Tim Cheung2, Jens T Siveke1
1Institute of Developmental Cancer Therapeutics,, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany
2Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
3Department of Immunodynamics, Institute of Experimental Immunology and Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Germany
4CONKO Study Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Haematology and Tumorimmunology, Universitätsmedizin Charité Berlin, Germany
5Department of Surgery, Charité University Hospital, Germany
6Praxis und Tagesklinik, Praxis und Tagesklinik, Germany
7Department of General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Germany
8Division of Functional Genome Analysis, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Germany
Luisa Piccin1, Pigozzo Jacopo1, Valentina Salizzato1, Paola Del Bianco2, Aline Sueli Cohelo Fabricio1, Laura Tiozzo Fasiolo1, Massimo Gion3, Adolfo Favaretto4, Dario Palleschi4, Costanza De Rossi5, Fable Zustovich6, Beatrice Benetti1, Alessio Fabozzi7, Gulia Pasello1,8, Valentina Guarneri1,8, Vanna Chiarion Sileni1
1UOC Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Italy
2Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Italy
3Regional Center for Biomarkers, SS Giovanni & Paolo Hospital, Italy
4Medical Oncology Unit, Cà Foncello Hospital, Italy
5Medical Oncology Unit, Angelo Hospital, ULSS 3 Serenissima, Italy
6Medical Oncology Unit, Belluno Hospital, ULSS 1, Italy
7UOC Oncology 3, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Italy
8Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Italy
Ildikó Fritz1, Philippe Wagner1, Håkan Olsson1,2
1Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
2Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
Pedi Jakob1, Roderich Bönninghoff2, Silja McIntyre3, Daniel Debatin4, Benjamin Goeppert5
1Radiology, St.Josefskrankenhaus Heidelberg, Germany
2Surgery, St.Josefskrankenhaus Heidelberg, Germany
3Gastroenterology, St.Josefskrankenhaus Heidelberg, Germany
4Oncology, Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Heidelberg, Germany
5Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
Gilles Tapolsky1, Richard Curry, III2, John Morris3, Catherine Muller4, Noonan Anne5, Vinay Puduvalli6, Olivier Rixe7, John Villano8, Robert Wesolowski5, Trecia Wise-Draper3, Ellmurah Yilmaz9, Ray Takigiku1
1R&D, Bexion Pharmaceuticals, USA
2Oncology, CTI, USA
3Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati, USA
4Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, USA
5Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, USA
6Neuro-Oncology, MD Andersen Cancer Center, USA
7Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, USA
8Neuro-Oncology, University of Kentucky Cancer Center, USA
9The Taussig Cancer Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Sheba Medical Center, Israel
Meet our Sponsors
Meet our Supporters
Contact Us
We look forward to hearing from you.